Transaction Details

Transaction Hash:
0x5d 070c794dd19e2f60666954f3f9d32643567d7780adad66ea1d717fb4c2 cd69
Status:
Success
Block:
19863235 Finalized
Timestamp:
2024-05-13 19:38:47 +0000 UTC
From:
0x2666f0…724607
brennen.eth
Interacted With:
Value:
0 ETH 0.00 ETH
Transaction Fee:
0.00135340 ETH 0.00 ETH
Effective Gas Price:
10.97057403 GWei
Execution Stats:
Used 123367 out of 179710 Gas (69%)
Gas Fees:
Base Block Fee: 10.96960403 GWei | Max Overall Fee: 14.04364694 GWei | Max Priority Fee: 0.00097 GWei
Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 667
Block Position: 120
Call Data:
Name:
VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)
Topics:
0 0xb8e138887d0aa13bab447e82de9d5c1777041ecd21ca36ba824ff1e6c07ddda4
1 0x0000000000000000000000002666f0c8fb58d182f2dd79475dca4a07b3724607
Data (Decoded):
proposalId uint256
538
reason string
100% would want to fund onchain summer, but do we get build boards with noggles or whats our big win? We should be more critical of props that don't have equal delivery of value, even if they come from valid sources. Aka hold all proposals more or less to the same value structures. +1 > It's evident that Nouns has a pretty solid footing on Base, and it's great that we're thinking about funding builders. However, the proposal seems a bit light on details, especially concerning who's running the workshops and who's judging the hackathon. Will these roles be filled if no one else steps up? Will there be additional funding for these tasks? > > "Thanks to Nouns for providing the prizing!" > > However, what is the follow-up here? I'm curious about what steps we're taking to get builders really hooked on what Nouns is all about. How do we plan to encourage them to dive deeper?
support uint8
0
voter address
votes uint256
3
Data (Hex):