Transaction Details

Transaction Hash:
0xe4 124d4326c69eba4bfd9afae06acae380f2b4ca9444c25d21996131c593 3dad
Status:
Success
Block:
19702057 Finalized
Timestamp:
2024-04-21 06:41:23 +0000 UTC
From:
0x9e0e9D…5257B1
nekofar.eth
Interacted With:
Value:
0 ETH 0.00 ETH
Transaction Fee:
0.00336321 ETH 0.00 ETH
Effective Gas Price:
6.12563168 GWei
Execution Stats:
Used 549040 out of 560091 Gas (98%)
Gas Fees:
Base Block Fee: 6.08527118 GWei | Max Overall Fee: 8.91159532 GWei | Max Priority Fee: 0.04036049 GWei
Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 284
Block Position: 63
Call Data:
Name:
ProposalCreated(uint256 id, address proposer, address[] targets, uint256[] values, string[] signatures, bytes[] calldatas, uint256 startBlock, uint256 endBlock, string description)
Topics:
0 0x7d84a6263ae0d98d3329bd7b46bb4e8d6f98cd35a7adb45c274c8b7fd5ebd5e0
Data (Decoded):
calldatas bytes[]
0x[0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002]
description string
# Lower Lil Nouns Proposal Threshold As of block number **19701574**, there are **2,252 holders** of Lil Nouns tokens. Of these, only **67 addresses** have the capability to submit proposals due to the current requirement of possessing at least **8 tokens**. This high threshold has unfortunately contributed to a stagnation in community involvement. Notably, our recent initiatives and Prop House rounds, which were once vital for attracting new participants, have diminished in effectiveness and are no longer actively pursued. Given these circumstances, I suggest we consider **lowering the proposal threshold from 8 tokens to just 2**. This adjustment would potentially expand the pool of eligible proposers from the current 67 to approximately **467**. While this reduction significantly lowers the barrier to participation, it maintains a necessary level of spam protection. Additionally, it could incentivize holders of a single Lil Nouns token to acquire one more, thus fostering a deeper commitment to our community. Implementing this change could reinvigorate engagement by enabling more members to **contribute their ideas directly on-chain**, ensuring that fresh perspectives and innovations are brought forth.
endBlock uint256
19734907
id uint256
197
proposer address
signatures string[]
[_setProposalThresholdBPS(uint256)]
startBlock uint256
19715197
targets address[]
[0x5d2C31ce16924C2a71D317e5BbFd5ce387854039]
values uint256[]
[0]
Data (Hex):
Name:
ProposalCreatedWithRequirements(uint256 id, address proposer, address[] targets, uint256[] values, string[] signatures, bytes[] calldatas, uint256 startBlock, uint256 endBlock, uint256 proposalThreshold, uint256 quorumVotes, string description)
Topics:
0 0x6af0134faa0f9290c1d686d55012aca80302d31d5c856e4bc7954f7613dc7f87
Data (Decoded):
calldatas bytes[]
0x[0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002]
description string
# Lower Lil Nouns Proposal Threshold As of block number **19701574**, there are **2,252 holders** of Lil Nouns tokens. Of these, only **67 addresses** have the capability to submit proposals due to the current requirement of possessing at least **8 tokens**. This high threshold has unfortunately contributed to a stagnation in community involvement. Notably, our recent initiatives and Prop House rounds, which were once vital for attracting new participants, have diminished in effectiveness and are no longer actively pursued. Given these circumstances, I suggest we consider **lowering the proposal threshold from 8 tokens to just 2**. This adjustment would potentially expand the pool of eligible proposers from the current 67 to approximately **467**. While this reduction significantly lowers the barrier to participation, it maintains a necessary level of spam protection. Additionally, it could incentivize holders of a single Lil Nouns token to acquire one more, thus fostering a deeper commitment to our community. Implementing this change could reinvigorate engagement by enabling more members to **contribute their ideas directly on-chain**, ensuring that fresh perspectives and innovations are brought forth.
endBlock uint256
19734907
id uint256
197
proposalThreshold uint256
7
proposer address
quorumVotes uint256
360
signatures string[]
[_setProposalThresholdBPS(uint256)]
startBlock uint256
19715197
targets address[]
[0x5d2C31ce16924C2a71D317e5BbFd5ce387854039]
values uint256[]
[0]
Data (Hex):